Anna University Punishments For Malpractice in Semester Exams

Latest: TNEA 2014 Engineering Application Status, Counselling Date, Rank List

Anna University Punishments For Malpractice in Semester Exams

Many Students without knowing the serious consequences, are involving in malpractices in the semester Examinations. Many of them are unaware of the punishments which are very severe. Anna university can even ultimately debar you from the courses for certain cases.

Most of the student don't know exactly what are the things not to be carried or possessed inside the exam hall. Even a silly unknown mistake can make you in trouble.

I hope that after reading this article many student will get an awareness of those malpractices and do not commit those mistakes in their Exams. 
Please share this valuable information with your friends and Don't forget to give +1

SI.No.	Nature of Malpractice	Maximum Punishment
1.	Appeal by the candidate in the answer script to show mercy by way of awarding more than deserving marks
2.	The candidate writing his/her name in the answer script.
3.	The candidate writing his/her registration number/college name in places other than specified in the answer script.
4.	Any special marking in the answer script by the candidate.	I. - Fine of Rs.1000/- per subject.
5.	The candidate communicating with neighbouring candidate orally or non-verbally; the candidate causing suspicious movement of his/her body.
6.	Irrelevant writing by the candidate in the answer script.
7.	The candidate either possessing the question paper of another candidate or passing his question paper to another candidate with the question paper containing no additional writing on it.
8.	The candidate possessing cell phones/programmable
	calculator(s)/any other electronic storage device(s) containing no incriminating materials.	II. - Fine of Rs.2000/- per subject.
9.	The candidate facilitating the other candidate(s) to copy	MA. — Invalidating the examination of the
	from his/her answer script,	particular subject written by the candidate.
		MA, IIIB or MC
10.	The candidate possessing any incriminating material(s) (whether used or not). For example:- Written or printed materials, bits of papers containing written information, writings on scale, calculator, handkerchief, dress, part of the body, Hall Ticket, etc.	MA — If the quantum of the incriminating material is less than that could normally be printed in two lines of AS size paper, then punishment is restricted to the subject concerned only.
11.	The candidate possessing cell phone(s)/programmable	IIIB — If the quantum is equal to or more than
	calculator(s)/any other electronic storage device(s) and	that could normally be printed in two lines and
	containing incriminating materials (whether used or not)	less than that could normally be printed in the full page of the AS size paper then the
12.	The candidate possessing the question paper of another	punishment is invalidating the examination of
	candidate with additional writing on it.	the subject concerned and further the candidate
13.	The candidate passing his/her question paper to another
		is not considered for any moderation and
	candidate with additional writing on it.	revaluation in the current semester for any subject (including arrear subjects)
14.	The candidate passing incriminating materials brought	MC — When the quantum is equal to or more
	into the examination hall in any medium (hard/soft) to	than that could normally be printed in full page
	other candidate(s).	of AS size paper, then the punishment would be
15.	The candidate copying from neighbouring candidate,	invalidating the examinations of the subject concerned and all the theory and the practical subjects of the current semester registered by the candidate. Further the candidate is not considered for revaluation of answer scripts of the arrear subjects.
		If the candidate has registered for the arrear subjects only, invalidating the examinations of all the arrear-subjects registered by the candidate. The punishment does not include project work and the subjects with 100% internal evaluation.

:2:

SI.No.	Nature of Malpractice	Maximum Punishment
16.	Vulgar/offensive writings by the candidate in the answer script.
17.	The candidate possessing the answer script of another
	candidate.	IV. — Invalidating the examinations of all the theory and practical subjects of the current
18.	The candidate passing his/her answer script to another	semester and all the arrears subjects
	candidate,	registered by the candidate.
19.	Appeal by the candidate in the answer script coupled with a promise of any form of consideration.
20.	The candidate misbehaving in the examination hall.	Va. — For candidates who have not
		completed the programme:
21	Involved in any one or more of the malpractices of serial no.10 to 19 for the second or subsequent times.	The examinations of all the theory and the practical subjects of the current semester and all the arrear subjects registered by the candidate are invalidated. Further, the candidate is debarred from continuing his/her studies for one year i.e for two subsequent semesters. However, the student is permitted to appear for the examination in all the arrear subjects upto the last semester during the debarred period.
		Vb. — For candidates who have completed
		the programme:
		The examinations of all the arrear subjects registered by the candidate are invalidated.
		Further, the candidate is prevented from writing the examinations of the arrear subjects for the two subsequent semesters.
22.	Cases of Impersonation.	For both the impersonator and the bonafide
		student for whom the impersonation was
		done.
		VI. — The examinations of all the subjects registered by the candidate are invalidated and further the student is debarred from continuing his/her studies and debarred from writing the examinations permanently.
		He/She is not eligible for any further admission to any programme of the
		University.